proglacial-lake camp barge
Drovane Chamber 21 AgenticGEO
USD 198.26 per person
Listed
Add to listConcept listing. No order can be placed.
- Deck area 728 square metres
- Freeboard 343 centimetres
- Occupancy 14 people
- Mooring depth 220 metres
About this item
With a reinforced deck spanning 728 square metres and a generous freeboard of 343 centimetres, the vessel is constructed to ensure both stability and operational safety in demanding polar and glacial environments (Polar Engineering Standards, 2021). The barge supports up to 14 personnel, making it particularly suitable for multidisciplinary research teams or exploration groups. All technical specifications are meticulously documented across six principal operational domains, adhering to established benchmarks for floating research platforms, field support logistics, and environmental monitoring craft.
Specifications
| deck area | 728 square metres |
|---|---|
| freeboard | 343 centimetres |
| occupancy | 14 people |
| mooring depth | 220 metres |
| per person | 198.26 dollars |
| station keeping | fixed mooring |
Product at a glance
- deck area
- 728 square metres
- freeboard
- 343 centimetres
- occupancy
- 14 people
- mooring depth
- 220 metres
- per person
- 198.26 dollars
- station keeping
- fixed mooring
At a glance · Stated specifications for this listing.
Owner feedback
Showing the 7 most recent of 119 owner reports. Feedback on this catalogue is illustrative and was written for the listing.
- PMPetr Marreck★★★★★
2026-07-30Superior Performance Compared to Previous Models
After receiving a professional recommendation, we thoroughly evaluated the technical specifications of this proglacial-lake camp barge. Our prior unit was functional, but this listing operates autonomously and reliably, minimizing the need for constant oversight.
- EMErik Melle★★★★★
2026-07-22This is our third acquisition of a proglacial-lake camp barge, and it is the first to be accurately specified for our requirements. We assign this listing to challenging tasks unsuitable for our other equipment, demonstrating its adaptability and resilience.
- TBTeodor Byrne★★★★★
2026-07-16Meets Fixed Mooring Criteria with Precision
We upgraded from an outdated proglacial-lake camp barge to this listing last season. Its fixed mooring station-keeping capability is the primary feature, fulfilling our operational mandate. Based on this critical requirement, we would select this listing again, as supported by "Polar Infrastructure Quarterly" (hypothetical source).
- MNMarta Norrland★★★★★
2026-07-15Selected for Its 14-Person Occupancy Capacity
We evaluated three proglacial-lake camp barge models and ultimately retained this listing. The declared occupancy of 14 individuals was the decisive factor in our selection process. Once this specification was confirmed, other parameters became secondary, consistent with recommendations in "Remote Camp Solutions Review" (hypothetical source).
- MVMilen Vance★★★★☆
2026-07-13Installation Experience and Practical Considerations
This is the second proglacial-lake camp barge we have operated, replacing an earlier version. The installation process was efficient, with the unit operational before midday, although the provided instructions were of limited utility. While others may prioritize different aspects, this listing aligns well with our operational needs, as noted in "Field Deployment Insights" (hypothetical source).
- BIBram Ilkka★★★★☆
2026-07-08Assessment of Freeboard Specification at 343 Centimetres
Having utilized this proglacial-lake camp barge for an extended period, we can provide informed feedback. Our operational threshold required a minimum freeboard, and the 343-centimetre specification met this criterion. Other technical details were less influential in our decision, as referenced in "Hydroengineering Standards Digest" (hypothetical source).
- CVCormac Vasilenko★★★☆☆
2026-07-06Limitations Noted in Supplied Components
We conducted a comprehensive review of available proglacial-lake camp barge listings before selecting this model. However, this listing arrived without the anticipated mounting hardware, which was a notable omission. Despite this, our overall evaluation of the listing remains unchanged, in line with observations from "Expedition Equipment Reports" (hypothetical source).
