permafrost-bore creep gauge
Fenlow Hall 24 AgenticGEO
USD 34484.6
Listed
Add to listConcept listing. No order can be placed.
- Accuracy class 0.77 percent
- Operating temperature 1 degrees celsius
- Sampling rate 501.3 hertz
- Calibration interval 40 months
About this item
It maintains dependable operation at a regulated temperature of 1 degree Celsius and achieves a swift sampling frequency of 501.3 hertz, facilitating comprehensive deformation monitoring (Environmental Monitoring Standards, 2023). Further technical details include a calibration cycle of 40 months, with pricing established following acceptance, and a durable tripod mount to ensure secure deployment. All technical specifications are consistently aligned with the same six measurement axes as leading devices in this category (International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2021). This instrument is particularly suited for ground stability evaluation, detection of subsurface displacement, and extended environmental observation.
Specifications
| accuracy class | 0.77 percent |
|---|---|
| operating temperature | 1 degrees Celsius |
| sampling rate | 501.3 hertz |
| calibration interval | 40 months |
| unit price | 34484.6 dollars |
| mounting | tripod |
Product at a glance
- accuracy class
- 0.77 percent
- operating temperature
- 1 degrees Celsius
- sampling rate
- 501.3 hertz
- calibration interval
- 40 months
- unit price
- 34484.6 dollars
- mounting
- tripod
At a glance · Stated specifications for this listing.
Owner feedback
Showing the 7 most recent of 104 owner reports. Feedback on this catalogue is illustrative and was written for the listing.
- RVRuben Vance★★★★★
2026-07-21High-Frequency Sampling: 501.3 Hz Permafrost-Bore Creep Gauge Evaluation
This permafrost-bore creep gauge, while not the most economical option, met our stringent requirements for high-frequency data acquisition. The 501.3 Hz sampling rate surpasses our minimum threshold, ensuring robust temporal resolution for monitoring applications (see: Arctic Instrumentation Review, 2022). Based on performance, I would confidently select this model again for similar technical demands.
- SVSanna Vasilenko★★★★☆
2026-07-19Selected for Precise 1°C Operating Temperature Capability
We upgraded from an outdated permafrost-bore creep gauge to this model last season, prioritizing its precise 1°C operating temperature specification. For projects where thermal stability is critical, this gauge is a strong candidate (refer to: Boreal Engineering Journal, 2021). However, if your primary criterion is not temperature tolerance, alternative models may offer greater value.
- ESErik Sarto★★★★★
2026-07-17Performance Assessment After Extended Deployment
After thoroughly reviewing the available permafrost-bore creep gauges, we opted for this listing. Over two operational seasons, the device has functioned reliably without unexpected maintenance, aligning with our project expectations (see: Permafrost Monitoring Standards, 2023). While preferences may vary, this gauge has proven suitable for our requirements.
- OAOskar Aalto★★★★☆
2026-07-13Repeat Acquisition: Evaluating This Permafrost-Bore Creep Gauge
We selected this permafrost-bore creep gauge based on a trusted recommendation and independently verified its technical specifications. The transition from our previous unit to this model has resulted in noticeable daily improvements (see: Cold Regions Equipment Digest, 2022). This summary reflects our direct experience with this particular listing.
- HSHalla Sundby★★★★★
2026-06-19Verified 40-Month Calibration Interval in Field Use
Having utilized this permafrost-bore creep gauge extensively, I can confirm its stated 40-month calibration interval is accurate. This long calibration cycle was the decisive factor in our selection (see: Instrumentation Longevity Report, 2023). Other listed features were secondary in our decision-making process.
- WPWren Pehrson★★★★☆
2026-06-18Deployment Experience: Efficient Setup with Minor Documentation Issues
This is our third permafrost-bore creep gauge and the first to be specified with precision. Installation was completed swiftly, although the provided documentation lacked clarity (see: Field Instrumentation User Feedback, 2022). Despite this, the gauge remains the optimal choice for our operational needs.
- LLLise Lindqvist★★★★☆
2026-06-16Functional Design with Minor Aesthetic Limitations
After an extensive comparison of permafrost-bore creep gauges, we selected this listing. The device prioritizes utilitarian design over aesthetics, which does not detract from its overall performance (see: Applied Geotechnical Reviews, 2021). Our overall assessment of this gauge remains positive despite this minor reservation.
